1. Forum
  2. DOVE-Net
  3. Programming

  • RE: Language to Transitio

    From ptaylor@VERT/MB to Jagossel on Wednesday, October 03, 2018 22:24:00
    J> I am trying to write a program using FreeBASIC and I hit a limitation
    J> that causes me to consider another langauge to get past said FreeBASIC
    J> limitation. The program that I'm writing is a DOS program and a side
    J> project. At the moment I have two options available: C++ (either DJGPP or
    J> Open Watcom) or Free Pascal.

    Hi

    What limitation are you running across. There are some other basic
    compilers out there.



    --- MagickaBBS v0.10alpha (Linux/x86_64)
    * Origin: magickabbs.dynu.net 2023 (1:275/201.1)
  • From ptaylor@VERT/MB to Digital Man on Wednesday, October 03, 2018 22:25:00
    D> Why not just plain-ole C?

    Learning a nother programming lanuage is not easy for everyone. I find
    that Pascal is easer to learn then C.



    --- MagickaBBS v0.10alpha (Linux/x86_64)
    * Origin: magickabbs.dynu.net 2023 (1:275/201.1)
  • From Jagossel@VERT/MTLGEEK to ptaylor on Thursday, October 04, 2018 08:32:12
    Re: RE: Language to Transitio
    By: ptaylor to Jagossel on Wed Oct 03 2018 22:24:00

    > J> I am trying to write a program using FreeBASIC and I hit a limitation
    > J> that causes me to consider another langauge to get past said FreeBASIC
    > J> limitation. The program that I'm writing is a DOS program and a side
    > J> project. At the moment I have two options available: C++ (either DJGPP o
    > J> Open Watcom) or Free Pascal.
    >
    > Hi
    >
    > What limitation are you running across. There are some other basic
    > compilers out there.

    Primarily, the printing characters not showing on the screen (e.g. TAB,
    BACKSPACE, DELETE, etc.). Turns out, those characters aren't used in the ANSI
    files to diplay anyways. So, FreeBASIC is behaving the same way as the ANSI
    text file. I noticed other ANSI art programs not using those printing
    characters either, I just decided to move on with character sets as others have
    as well.

    -jag
    Code it, Script it, Automate it!


    ---
    þ Synchronet þ MtlGeek - Geeks in Montreal - http://mtlgeek.com/
    Preview image
    mtlgeek
    MTLGEEK bbs (montreal, quebec, canada)
    -
  • From Lizard King@VERT/RUNDER to ptaylor on Saturday, October 20, 2018 01:08:25
    Re: RE: Language to Transitio
    By: ptaylor to Digital Man on Wed Oct 03 2018 22:25:00

    > Learning a nother programming lanuage is not easy for everyone. I find
    > that Pascal is easer to learn then C.

    Pascal is definitely an easier language to learn than C. It's sort of a dying
    language though.

    I went BASIC -> Pascal -> C -> Perl -> PHP, with many languages inflicted on me
    by professors (VAX asm, Modula-3, Prolog, C++) and some little adventures of my
    own (TCL/TK, Ruby, Python).

    If I was starting over from scratch, I think I'd go with Python. It is still
    gaining popularity and is powerful enough to do a lot of useful things on a lot
    of different platforms.

    I think Ruby should be used to teach object oriented programming. It is SO
    object-oriented that it's almost awkward to write procedural code in it
    (exactly the opposite of most languages that had objects grafted on after the
    fact).

    //lizard_king

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Retro Underground - retrounderground.org:6423
  • From Nightfox@VERT/DIGDIST to Lizard King on Monday, October 22, 2018 10:02:58
    Re: RE: Language to Transitio
    By: Lizard King to ptaylor on Sat Oct 20 2018 01:08 am

    LK> I think Ruby should be used to teach object oriented programming. It is SO
    LK> object-oriented that it's almost awkward to write procedural code in it
    LK> (exactly the opposite of most languages that had objects grafted on after
    LK> the fact).

    That's not necessarily ideal though. Some types of projects might lend
    themselves better to a more procedural style of coding, and some people might
    prefer one or the other. I'm not sure I like languages that force one style on
    the programmer. I do tend to write most things in an object oriented way
    though. It seems a bit silly in languages that force object-oriented
    programming, that their main function has to be a static function that's part
    of a class. :P Java is like that, at least..

    Nightfox

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com