Re: What is your preferred editor for scripting or quick editing?
By: Nightfox to (null) on Fri Sep 01 2017 01:52 pm

> What is your favorite editor for editing scripts or quickly
> editing a source code file?
>
> 1: Notepad [0 0.00%]
> 2: Notepad2 (Flo's Freeware) [1 33.33%] �
> 3: Notepad++ [1 33.33%] �
> 4: Sublime Text [0 0.00%]
> 5: Vim [0 0.00%]
> 6: Kate [0 0.00%]
> 7: Emacs [0 0.00%]
> 8: Atom [0 0.00%]
> 9: Visual Studio Code [1 33.33%] �
> 10: UltraEdit [0 0.00%]
> 11: Other [0 0.00%]

Another difficult poll to answer. :(

I use Visual Studio Code for larger scripting projects and PowerShell
scripts/modules.

It would appear that the quick text editing tool that I use is pretty obscure:
Geany.

-jag
Code it... Script it... Automate it!

---
� Synchronet � Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com

> Re: What is your preferred editor for scripting or quick editing?
> By: Nightfox to (null) on Fri Sep 01 2017 01:52 pm

> > What is your favorite editor for editing scripts or quickly
> > editing a source code file?

> > 1: Notepad [0 0.00%]
> > 2: Notepad2 (Flo's Freeware) [1 33.33%] �
> > 3: Notepad++ [1 33.33%] �
> > 4: Sublime Text [0 0.00%]
> > 5: Vim [0 0.00%]
> > 6: Kate [0 0.00%]
> > 7: Emacs [0 0.00%]
> > 8: Atom [0 0.00%]
> > 9: Visual Studio Code [1 33.33%] �
> > 10: UltraEdit [0 0.00%]
> > 11: Other [0 0.00%]

> Another difficult poll to answer. :(

> I use Visual Studio Code for larger scripting projects and PowerShell
> scripts/modules.

> It would appear that the quick text editing tool that I use is pretty
> obscure: Geany.

> -jag
> Code it... Script it... Automate it!

> ---
> � Synchronet � Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com

Since I only code for wamp or lamp in php/mysql/html mixed with snippets of js
and ajax I just use devphp on the winblows platform ... just sayin ... :\

---
� Synchronet � Twisted Trucker BBS, Dartmouth NS Canada

Re: What is your preferred editor for scripting or quick editing?
By: Nightfox to on Fri Sep 01 2017 01:52 pm

Ni> What is your favorite editor for editing scripts or quickly
Ni> editing a source code file?

I'm surprised there aren't more votes for Sublime Text. Such a fantastic text
editor, particularly its multiple selection and columnar selection abilities.

Most of my life I was a BBedit user on the Mac. I still use BBedit on the Mac,
but after using ST on my work PC for a couple years, I'm about to ditch BBedit.

--Josh

////--------------------------------------------------
BiC -=- http://breakintochat.com
-=- bbs wiki and blog

---
� Synchronet

Re: What is your preferred editor for scripting or quick editing?
By: Kirkman to Nightfox on Tue Sep 05 2017 12:54:43

> I'm surprised there aren't more votes for Sublime Text. Such a fantastic tex
t
> editor, particularly its multiple selection and columnar selection abilities
.

Any chance it has something to do with the fact that it costs US$70 for one
license? That's what drove me away from using Sublime Text and just stick with
Visual Studio Code and Geany.

-jag
Code it, Script it, Automate it!

---
� Synchronet � MtlGeek - Geeks in Montreal - http://mtlgeek.com/
-

Re: What is your preferred editor for scripting or quick editing?
By: Kirkman to Nightfox on Tue Sep 05 2017 12:54 pm

Ki> I'm surprised there aren't more votes for Sublime Text. Such a fantastic
Ki> text editor, particularly its multiple selection and columnar selection
Ki> abilities.

I've used Sublime Text, and it seems good, although I haven't used it enough to
know it well. Where I work, in particular, I've avoided Sublime Text because
my understanding is it needs a licence to be purchased for commercial use.
There are enough editors out there that I can just use a different editor.
I've gotten to like Notepad++ recently.

Nightfox

---
� Synchronet � Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com

Re: What is your preferred editor for scripting or quick editing?
By: Nightfox to Kirkman on Tue Sep 05 2017 12:49 pm

> commercial use. There are enough editors out there that I can just use a
> different editor. I've gotten to like Notepad++ recently.

I use Notepad++ almost exclusively.

---
� Synchronet � StarFlight BBS - bbs.starflightbbs.com

Re: What is your preferred editor for scripting or quick editing?
By: The Navigator to Nightfox on Tue Sep 05 2017 07:46 pm

> Re: What is your preferred editor for scripting or quick editing?
> By: Nightfox to Kirkman on Tue Sep 05 2017 12:49 pm

> > commercial use. There are enough editors out there that I can just use a
> > different editor. I've gotten to like Notepad++ recently.

> I use Notepad++ almost exclusively.



editpad pro is great.
---
� Synchronet � ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::

Re: What is your preferred editor for scripting or quick editing?
By: Mro to The Navigator on Wed Sep 06 2017 06:34 pm

> > I use Notepad++ almost exclusively.
>
> editpad pro is great.

Yes it is, I used it for several years.

---
� Synchronet � StarFlight BBS - bbs.starflightbbs.com

On 2017-09-01 11:52 PM, Nightfox wrote:
> What is your favorite editor for editing scripts or quickly
> editing a source code file?
>
> 1: Notepad
> 2: Notepad2 (Flo's Freeware)
> 3: Notepad++
> 4: Sublime Text
> 5: Vim
> 6: Kate
> 7: Emacs
> 8: Atom
> 9: Visual Studio Code
> 10: UltraEdit
> 11: Other
>
Nano
Nano
Nano is absolutely the best. Also only recently I figured out how to cut
and paste in nano. Now I feel like a real pro.

---
* Synchronet * KK4QBN - kk4qbn.synchro.net - 7064229538 - Chatsworth GA USA

Re: Re: What is your preferred editor for scripting or quick editing?
By: Deavmi to Nightfox on Sat Sep 16 2017 21:59:03


De> Nano
De> Nano
De> Nano is absolutely the best. Also only recently I figured out how to cut
De> and paste in nano. Now I feel like a real pro.

Really? ctrlk.. ctrlu, wel in pico at least thats what I use and is my
favorite.... always has been..

--

Tim Smith (KK4QBN)
KK4QBN BBS

---
* Synchronet * KK4QBN - kk4qbn.synchro.net - 7064229538 - Chatsworth GA USA

Re: Re: What is your preferred editor for scripting or quick editing?
By: Deavmi to Nightfox on Sat Sep 16 2017 09:59 pm

> On 2017-09-01 11:52 PM, Nightfox wrote:
> > What is your favorite editor for editing scripts or quickly
> > editing a source code file?

> > 1: Notepad
> > 2: Notepad2 (Flo's Freeware)
> > 3: Notepad++
> > 4: Sublime Text
> > 5: Vim
> > 6: Kate
> > 7: Emacs
> > 8: Atom
> > 9: Visual Studio Code
> > 10: UltraEdit
> > 11: Other

> Nano
> Nano
> Nano is absolutely the best. Also only recently I figured out how to cut
> and paste in nano. Now I feel like a real pro.

joe!
---
� Synchronet � ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::

-=> Deavmi wrote to Nightfox <=-

De> Nano is absolutely the best. Also only recently I figured out how to
De> cut and paste in nano. Now I feel like a real pro.

I like nano, but remember to use the -w switch to turn off word wrapping. :)


... A liberal is a man too broadminded to take his own side in a quarrel.
--- MultiMail/Win32 v0.49
� Synchronet � Freeway BBS in Bendigo, Australia.

Re: Re: What is your preferred editor for scripting or quick editing?
By: Deavmi to Nightfox on Sat Sep 16 2017 09:59 pm

De> Nano

I used PINE for years, so PICO/NANO are second nature to me. I usually use vi
for config files and NANO for everything else.

---
� Synchronet � realitycheckBBS -- http://realitycheckBBS.org

-=> poindexter FORTRAN wrote to Deavmi <=-

pF> Re: Re: What is your preferred editor for scripting or quick editing?
pF> By: Deavmi to Nightfox on Sat Sep 16 2017 09:59 pm

De> Nano

pF> I used PINE for years, so PICO/NANO are second nature to me. I usually
pF> use vi for config files and NANO for everything else.

pF> ---
pF> � Synchronet � realitycheckBBS -- http://realitycheckBBS.org


on *nix - vim; on M$ - notepad++
__ System Operator __
__ / /__ _______ __ __ __ / /
/ // / _ `/_ /_ // // / / // /
\___/\_,_//__/__/\_, / \___/ Web:80
of Jay's Cafe'/___/jayscafe.jayctheriot.com:23
... Gone crazy, be back later, please leave message.
--- MultiMail/Win32 v0.49
� Synchronet � Jay's Cafe' - jayscafe.jayctheriot.com port 23

Re: Re: What is your preferred editor for scripting or quick editing?
By: poindexter FORTRAN to Deavmi on Sun Sep 17 2017 10:32 am

PF> I used PINE for years, so PICO/NANO are second nature to me. I usually use
PF> vi for config files and NANO for everything else.

At one of my old jobs, we worked in Linux and I got fairly good with vim. I
had it customized with some color schemes for various programming languages and
had some macros configured in it that I thought were handy (inserting Doxygen
comments above function decalarations, removing extraneous whitespace in a
document, etc.). I got fairly used to vim, but I haven't used it a whole lot
since that job.

Nightfox

---
� Synchronet � Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com

Hello Vk3jed,

On Sun Sep 17 2017 17:06:00, Vk3jed wrote to Deavmi:

De>> Nano is absolutely the best. Also only recently I figured out how
De>> to cut and paste in nano. Now I feel like a real pro.

Vj> I like nano, but remember to use the -w switch to turn off word
Vj> wrapping. :)

Instead, try using v2.8.6 or above. (I'm currently using v2.8.7, which may be
the latest version). Now in conjunction with softwrap (-$ switch) you can use
"set atblanks" in your nanorc. This will now save word boundaries when wrapping
at the end of the line, and also keeping your 'paragraph' in tact, no matter
what size your screen or window is.

Older versions would wrap at the end of the line, no matter if you were in the
middle of a word or not, and would crop up the word displaying it on both lines
instead of wrapping the whole word.

I never liked the -w switch, so I requested the softwrap feature above
somewhere around v2.8.4. I tested some patches submitted with a few others, and
it was included in v2.8.6 and above. Now I use it as my default editor for
posting messages here even.

Regards,
Nick

... "Не знаю. Я здесь только работаю."
--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20170303
* Origin: thePharcyde_ distribution system (Wisconsin) (723:1/1)
� Synchronet � thePharcyde_ telnet://bbs.pharcyde.org (Wisconsin)

-=> Accession wrote to Vk3jed <=-

Ac> Instead, try using v2.8.6 or above. (I'm currently using v2.8.7, which
Ac> may be the latest version). Now in conjunction with softwrap (-$
Ac> switch) you can use "set atblanks" in your nanorc. This will now save
Ac> word boundaries when wrapping at the end of the line, and also keeping
Ac> your 'paragraph' in tact, no matter what size your screen or window is.

I use all sorts of versions, depends what system I'm on, so probably best to be
consistent with the -w for programming.

Ac> Older versions would wrap at the end of the line, no matter if you were
Ac> in the middle of a word or not, and would crop up the word displaying
Ac> it on both lines instead of wrapping the whole word.

Been ages since I've used word wrapping in nano. :)

Ac> I never liked the -w switch, so I requested the softwrap feature above
Ac> somewhere around v2.8.4. I tested some patches submitted with a few
Ac> others, and it was included in v2.8.6 and above. Now I use it as my
Ac> default editor for posting messages here even.

Soft wrap is definitely a great option for a message editor. :)


... BUFFERS=20 FILES=15 2nd down, 4th quarter, 5 yards to go!
--- MultiMail/Win32 v0.49
� Synchronet � Freeway BBS in Bendigo, Australia.

> Re: What is your preferred editor for scripting or quick editing?
> By: Kirkman to Nightfox on Tue Sep 05 2017 12:54:43

> > I'm surprised there aren't more votes for Sublime Text. Such a fantastic
> > tex
> t
> > editor, particularly its multiple selection and columnar selection
> > abilities
> .

> Any chance it has something to do with the fact that it costs US$70 for one
> license? That's what drove me away from using Sublime Text and just stick
> with Visual Studio Code and Geany.

Several years back, I was searching for a good editor for college. For
HTML/CSS/Javascript, we were using Notepad++ in the lab. I found it to be a bit
ugly for my taste, and the syntax highlighting seemed clunky (the previous
semester I got hooked on Visual Studio learning C#).

I tested several free editors out, and I settled on Sublime Text. I loathe the
new "cloud" licensing model everybody's moving to. Maybe it's just because I'm
older, but I like the old box store model. Pay for something and it's yours;
you decide if you want to upgrade or stick with what works.

Anyways, at the time I loved Sublime Text's license. I thought it was better
than most of the other editors, and I liked the model. Pay once, use
everywhere. And, it could run off a flash drive. I was able to use the same
software in five different locations.

Visual Studio Code had just been released at that time. I gave it some time to
"mature". I believe Adobe had also started an open source editor about the same
time. I tried both, and then started using Code in place of Sublime. In the
end, while Code seems a bit heavy, I thoroughly enjoy it, and I think it's
highlighting is even better than Sublime.

I was able to snag an adjunct instructor position right out of college. I
created a list of recommended editors for my students. Looking at the list, I'm
currently recommending: VS Code, Brackets, Atom, Sublime Text. I put Sublime at
the bottom of the list due to the license, although I explain they can use it
for the course, and it's still recommended.

---
� Synchronet � Southeast Texas BBS